arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Enhancing Factuality through Consensus and Consistency in Summarization Using Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.29336 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 May 2026]

Title:Enhancing Factuality through Consensus and Consistency in Summarization Using Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding

View a PDF of the paper titled Enhancing Factuality through Consensus and Consistency in Summarization Using Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding, by Riza Setiawan Soetedjo and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Improving the quality of model-generated summaries, especially factuality, the accuracy of a summary with respect to its source content, remains a challenge. While reranking could select the optimal output from multiple generated candidates, it is limited to only using the source as guidance, resulting in unreliable summaries. To address this limitation, we propose ConSUM that reranks candidate summaries by considering two factors: consistency to the source document and consensus among the other candidates. Consensus is established using Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding over the set of generated summaries, while ensuring consistency by employing factuality-aware metrics that compare the summary against the source. Rigorous testing demonstrates that our system is competitive with existing methods, with human evaluations further confirming that its generated summaries are preferred over those from other systems. Our code is available at this https URL .
Comments: Accepted to ACL 2026 Findings
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.29336 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.29336v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29336
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Riza Setiawan Soetedjo [view email]
[v1] Thu, 28 May 2026 04:14:43 UTC (1,500 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Enhancing Factuality through Consensus and Consistency in Summarization Using Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding, by Riza Setiawan Soetedjo and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language