arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Systematic Evaluation of Learning Rate Scheduling Strategies Across Heterogeneous Architectures

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2607.08511 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Jul 2026]

Title:Systematic Evaluation of Learning Rate Scheduling Strategies Across Heterogeneous Architectures

View a PDF of the paper titled Systematic Evaluation of Learning Rate Scheduling Strategies Across Heterogeneous Architectures, by Hafsa Mateen and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Choosing a learning rate scheduling strategy is critical to neural network training, but manual selection is costly and rarely exhaustive. While classical AutoML approaches often treat the scheduler as a secondary hyperparameter, we systematically investigate its impact on classification accuracy across a diverse pool of architectures. We evaluated 30 representative architectures from convolutional and transformer families within the LEMUR neural network dataset. Through automated source-code injection, we applied 25 scheduler configurations across nine PyTorch families, evaluating a total of 3,938 model variants on CIFAR-10. Our best configuration achieved a top-1 accuracy of 86.45%, with 237 variants exceeding 80%. The results show that the choice of scheduler depends heavily on the architecture: CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts and CyclicLR consistently outperform basic decay strategies. The resulting accuracy landscape, contributed to the LEMUR nn-dataset, provides a practical reference for principled scheduler selection.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.08511 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2607.08511v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.08511
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hafsa Mateen HafsaMateen [view email]
[v1] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:06:39 UTC (251 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Systematic Evaluation of Learning Rate Scheduling Strategies Across Heterogeneous Architectures, by Hafsa Mateen and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning