Would you take an MLE role with 50% base salary increase with rigid pto policy and no 401K match? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
I got an offer for an MLE role where basically i will develop ML/GENAI solutions for clients completely and then hand them over and move to other projects.
I think its a consulting ML role, although from a salary perspective its amazing and base is 50% more and if i add my new bonus its roughly 60% more. But the new company has fixed start and end time, have to send time cards, no pto for first 90 days, unlimited pto rest of the time. No 401k match now but planning to add it in the future. They do have a 401k system where i can login and access my funds like fidelity.
Team is big and lots of ml and ai projects and manager and skip were amazing and friendly. Probably 1500 people applied for this role
Thoughts?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
-
worldproof: diagnosing where world-model predictions break and a measurement of when pixel metrics stop being able to rank models at all [P]
Aug 13
-
UrgenT Help Detecting Performance Regressions Using Machine Learning and Hardware Counters [P]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.