I built an "honest" CS conference ranking: sorted by how good the trip is, not the CORE ranking [P]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Once the paper is ready, everyone checks the venue location before the acceptance rate anyway. So I built:https://honestcsrankings.org
It maps ~540 upcoming CORE-ranked conferences, but ranks them by how good the destination actually is. It factors in:
- Weather during the actual conference month (using real climate data)
- Safety (Global Peace Index)
- Cost (World Bank price levels)
- Accessibility & "City Vibe"
I also added an Upsets tab for A* venues in terrible destinations. Great for your CV, bad for your holiday.
You can filter by field, rank, or open deadlines. If you set your home city, you can rank by distance to either maximize that funded long-haul trip or minimize it, your call. You can also export deadlines to .ics and share deep links with coauthors.
ICML/ICLR 2027 are missing because they aren't announced yet, and COLM is missing because CORE hasn't ranked it. The long tail of smaller conferences is scraped from WikiCFP, so there will be some errors.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
-
worldproof: diagnosing where world-model predictions break and a measurement of when pixel metrics stop being able to rank models at all [P]
Aug 13
-
UrgenT Help Detecting Performance Regressions Using Machine Learning and Hardware Counters [P]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.