Geometry Is Not Robustness: A Trajectory-Level Study of PGD Evaluation
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2608.14594 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Jun 2026]
Title:Geometry Is Not Robustness: A Trajectory-Level Study of PGD Evaluation
Authors:Dhairysheel Durgule
View a PDF of the paper titled Geometry Is Not Robustness: A Trajectory-Level Study of PGD Evaluation, by Dhairysheel Durgule
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) is widely used to evaluate adversarial robustness, typically via final adversarial accuracy, which does not capture model behaviour throughout the attack. Recent work proposes trajectory-level diagnostics, such as loss evolution, gradient alignment, and steps-to-failure, for deeper insight into adversarial optimisation dynamics. However, whether these diagnostics reliably indicate robustness strength remains unclear. We conduct a trajectory-level investigation of PGD attacks on convolutional neural networks trained on Fashion-MNIST. We compare clean-trained and adversarially-trained models across multiple robustness regimes, using rigorous 20-step PGD evaluations with random initialisation and multiple restarts for robustness measurement, and single-initialisation trajectory recording for diagnostics. We record full PGD trajectories across 3000 clean-correct samples per model and analyse loss evolution, gradient alignment, and failure timing across attack iterations. Our results reveal a clear robustness hierarchy across models; however, trajectory metrics do not contribute equally to its identification. Mean loss trajectories and gradient alignment patterns appear quantitatively similar across adversarially-trained models with substantially different robust accuracies. In contrast, steps-to-failure distributions provide a clearer separation of robustness regimes, directly reflecting functional resistance to adversarial perturbation. These findings indicate that trajectory-level diagnostics describe optimisation geometry but do not independently measure adversarial robustness. Their interpretability depends on robustness regime, attack strength, and multi-metric evaluation. Trajectory-level analysis should be a complementary diagnostic tool, interpreted in context, rather than a replacement for standard robustness measurements.
| Comments: | 16 pages, 3 figures |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.14594 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.14594v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14594
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Dhairysheel Durgule [view email][v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 05:28:33 UTC (90 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Geometry Is Not Robustness: A Trajectory-Level Study of PGD Evaluation, by Dhairysheel Durgule
References & Citations
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.