How to cite/talk about preprint-subsequent works for a camera-ready version? [R]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
I had a paper accepted to a conference. This paper was originally published as a preprint. Subsequent works citing our preprint focused on the same topic and reused/extended our methodology. I am now preparing the camera-ready version of that preprint and I'm wondering how I should deal with this for the Related work section. It seems odd to me to cite my own preprint for the camera-ready version of the paper (and I am not even sure if this is allowed), but at the same time, I don't want to undermine the novelty of my original work (nor undermine the efforts of subsequent works). Has anyone dealt with such a situation before? What's the best way of solving this?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
COLM 2026 registration sold out as an author [D]
Aug 23
-
Archival vs non archival workshop [R]
Aug 23
-
When an AI agent says “done” how do you know it actually happened? [P]
Aug 23
-
I gave a repair tool exactly one worked example. It inferred the rest and fixed 5/5 bugs in code it had never seen — 4 CPU instructions, zero tokens.[p]
Aug 23
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.