Traditional machine learning vs. deep learning from dynamic graph representations of proteins' 3D folds in the task of protein structure classification
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2605.29228 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 May 2026]
Title:Traditional machine learning vs. deep learning from dynamic graph representations of proteins' 3D folds in the task of protein structure classification
View a PDF of the paper titled Traditional machine learning vs. deep learning from dynamic graph representations of proteins' 3D folds in the task of protein structure classification, by Aydin Wells and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Protein structure classification (PSC) uses supervised learning to predict a protein's CATH/SCOP(e) class from the protein's sequence or 3D structural feature(s). We already modeled 3D structures as (static) protein structure networks (PSNs), demonstrating the competitiveness of PSN-based features to sequence or direct (i.e. non-network) 3D structural features in the PSC task. More recently, we demonstrated the power of features extracted from dynamic PSNs over features extracted from static PSNs (and thus by transitivity over sequence and direct 3D structural features) in the same task. That dynamic PSN approach used traditional machine learning (ML), combining manual (pre-engineered) features with an off-the-shelf classifier. Here, we evaluate whether automatic deep learning (DL) from the dynamic PSNs yields improvements. Our evaluation on 72 datasets spanning ~44,000 CATH- or SCOPe-labeled dynamic PSNs reveals that in terms of PSC accuracy, traditional ML and DL are (close to) tied for a large majority of the datasets, while DL is on average 10+ times slower. We are the first to evaluate traditional ML vs. DL in the dynamic PSN-based PSC task.
| Comments: | Main paper: 16 pages, 4 figures, and 1 table; Supplementary information: 13 pages, 9 figures |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Molecular Networks (q-bio.MN) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.29228 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.29228v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29228
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Traditional machine learning vs. deep learning from dynamic graph representations of proteins' 3D folds in the task of protein structure classification, by Aydin Wells and 3 other authors
Current browse context:
cs.LG
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
One Mask to Rule Them All: On Hidden Facts after Editing and How to Find Them
May 29
-
Representation Signatures and Risk-Feedback Alignment in LLM Trading Agents
May 29
-
Mechanistic origins of catastrophic forgetting: why RL preserves circuits better than SFT?
May 29
-
Molecular Lead Optimization via Agentic Tool Planning
May 29
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.