Algorithmic Foundations of Deep Learning: Complexity-Theoretic Rates and a Characterization of Universal Approximation
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Algorithmic Foundations of Deep Learning: Complexity-Theoretic Rates and a Characterization of Universal Approximation
Abstract:Feedforward neural network (NN) expressivity is typically studied by emulating optimal basis-expansion schemes. While powerful, this perspective is incomplete: it primarily captures complexity through regularity, and therefore does not distinguish intuitively simple and complicated objects with comparable regularity, such as the square-root function and a typical Brownian path.
The guiding message is that neural networks should be viewed not only as flexible basis functions, but also as models of computation. If a function is computable by a real-valued circuit over a prescribed elementary gate language, then it can be computed to comparable accuracy by an NN with explicit depth, width, and non-zero-parameter bounds controlled by the depth, width, gate count, and gate structure. Thus, neural-network complexity is not governed by regularity alone, but also by algorithmic complexity. We then show that any definable NN model satisfying a natural parallelization condition, allowing possibly multivariate non-linearities such as attention or layer normalization, is a universal approximator if and only if it contains a non-affine nonlinearity.
The scope of our theory is illustrated by deducing universal approximation guarantees for continuous functions, minimax-optimal approximation guarantees for Besov classes, logarithmic-error complexity for holomorphic functions, and by showing that NNs can emulate numerical algorithms such as Newton-Raphson root finding and power iteration without architecture-specific arguments. Its precision is illustrated by shortest-path computation on $k$-vertex graphs: compiling the tropical dynamic-programming circuit yields NNs with O(log(1/{\epsilon})) non-zero parameters, exponentially improving in 1/{\epsilon} over the generic $O({\epsilon}^{-c k^2})$ Lipschitz-approximation scale, for a constant c>0.
| Comments: | 27 Main Body, 48 Page Proofs, 9 Figures |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Numerical Analysis (math.NA) |
| MSC classes: | 68T07, 41A46, 68Q06, 68Q25, 41A25, 03C64, 65D15 |
| ACM classes: | F.1.3; F.2.1; G.1.2; I.2.6 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.26705 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.26705v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.26705
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Anastasis Kratsios [view email][v1] Thu, 25 Jun 2026 07:34:20 UTC (2,839 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Can AI Draw Science? A Benchmark for Evaluating Scientific Figure Generation by Text-to-Image and Multimodal Models
Jun 30
-
On the Necessity of a Liquid Substrate for Mesh Intelligence
Jun 30
-
Position: RL Researchers Need to Distinguish Between Solving Simulators and Using Simulators as a Proxy
Jun 30
-
Learning to Distributedly Estimate under Partially Known Dynamics: A Covariance-Agnostic Neural Kalman Consensus Filter
Jun 30
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.