Learn from Whoever Is Right: Answer-Verified Multi-Teacher Distillation for Multi-Domain LLMs
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Learn from Whoever Is Right: Answer-Verified Multi-Teacher Distillation for Multi-Domain LLMs
Abstract:Modern large language models (LLMs) rely on reinforcement learning to build strong capabilities in individual domains, but integrating those capabilities into a single deployable model remains challenging. By routing each sample to the teacher whose domain matches it, existing approaches let a domain label decide which teacher provides supervision. However, domain expertise holds only on average: the matched teacher is not always correct on a given sample, while a teacher from another domain sometimes is. The reliable teacher therefore has to be identified per sample, not per domain. In this paper, we introduce Multi-Teacher Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (MT-SDPO), an on-policy distillation method that unifies several frozen teachers into one student model. MT-SDPO consists of three components: (1) self-anchors, where a rollout is supervised by a correct rollout from its own group; (2) answer-verified eligibility, where a teacher may supervise a sample only if its own answer passes a verifier; and (3) privileged distillation, which merges the anchor and all verified feedback into one context that an exponential moving average self-teacher reads and the student does not, thereby keeping one policy at deployment. Across five students from three model families, MT-SDPO lifts the weakest domain of Qwen3-8B by 14.79 points and narrows its domain gap by 74.7%, a better balance than serving one matched teacher per domain. Verified reliability, not domain membership, should decide who teaches. Code is available at this https URL.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.02548 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.02548v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02548
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
AhaBench: Do Agents Learn from Prior Experience? A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Continual Learning
Sep 10
-
When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic
Sep 10
-
Multi-granularity Adaptive Hypergraph Representation Learning via Granular-ball
Sep 10
-
Capsule Lens: Locating and Tracking Concept Geometry in Model Representations
Sep 10
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.