StageGuard: Physiologically Constrained Sleep Staging
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:StageGuard: Physiologically Constrained Sleep Staging
Abstract:Automated sleep staging is increasingly used in large-scale studies to derive sleep-architecture endpoints: total sleep time, REM latency, sleep efficiency, and bout-duration statistics. Deep learning models achieve epoch-level accuracy approaching inter-rater agreement, yet often produce hypnograms that violate physiological invariants, such as rare transitions (e.g., direct Wake -> REM) or excessively fragmented sequences. Such violations can bias downstream sleep metrics, regardless of overall accuracy. We propose StageGuard, a plug-and-play, backbone-agnostic structured-inference framework that wraps any neural sleep-staging backbone with physiology-informed priors. StageGuard combines (1) a differentiable soft transition penalty that discourages physiologically rare transitions during training, and (2) a semi-Markov constrained decoder with a duration-augmented state space that jointly enforces transition penalties and minimum bout durations at inference. Unlike hard-prohibition methods, it admits rare transitions when emission evidence is overwhelming, leaving informative pathological events recoverable rather than blocked. StageGuard constrains staging outputs to satisfy known physiological priors rather than modeling sleep generatively. We quantify the validity gap using transition-violation rate (TVR) and fragmentation index (FI) and demonstrate that, across six backbones and four datasets, StageGuard reduces TVR to physiologically plausible levels and lowers FI by 56-62%, while maintaining or slightly improving classification accuracy. Crucially, improved constraint satisfaction translates into 59-79% lower error on derived sleep-architecture statistics not directly optimized by the method, and recovers the direction and effect size of expert-defined subgroup differences (OSA severity, age) more faithfully than the unconstrained baseline.
| Comments: | 12 pages. Accepted at KDD 2026 (32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference), AI for Sciences track |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.23284 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2607.23284v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23284
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
|
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1145/3770855.3818916
DOI(s) linking to related resources
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
MS-MLB: An Open Machine Learning Benchmark for Blood-Based MS Classification
Aug 7
-
When Do Corrective Features Help? An Agent for Corrective Feature Discovery on Black-Box Forecasters
Aug 7
-
PPDL: LLM-Based Flows as Probabilistic Programs
Aug 7
-
Decoupling Perception from Description: Computation-Grounded Representation Alignment between Multivariate Time Series and Language
Aug 7
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.