r/LocalLLaMA · · 1 min read

Qwen 3.8 27B Vs. Qwen 3.6 27B on oMLX

Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Qwen 3.8 27B Vs. Qwen 3.6 27B on oMLX

Quality: 81.1 → 87.7 (+8%)

Speed: 35 → 29 tok/s (−16%)

Runtime: 8m51s → 44m39s (5x longer)

Output tokens: 18K → 78K (🤯)

Noticeably better quality, but you're paying for it with tokens and time.
Full benchmark results (all hardware, all quants): llm-bench.io Qwen3.6-27B Vs. Qwen3.8-27B

submitted by /u/DerTomsn
[link] [comments]

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from r/LocalLLaMA