Assessing Dutch Syllabification Algorithms and Improving Accuracy by Combining Phonetic and Orthographic Information through Deep Learning
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2605.28834 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Apr 2026]
Title:Assessing Dutch Syllabification Algorithms and Improving Accuracy by Combining Phonetic and Orthographic Information through Deep Learning
View a PDF of the paper titled Assessing Dutch Syllabification Algorithms and Improving Accuracy by Combining Phonetic and Orthographic Information through Deep Learning, by Gus Lathouwers and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Syllabification describes the task of dividing words into syllables. Due to many rules and exceptions, training an algorithm to perform syllabification with high accuracy remains a challenge. Throughout the last decades, different algorithms have been put forth for Dutch syllabification, yet a comprehensive comparative assessment has not been done. Additionally, deep learning has gained significant popularity within NLP in recent years, yet no modern deep-learning based framework has been developed for Dutch orthographic syllabification. Finally, phonetic and orthographic syllabification algorithms have been examined separately, but not in combination. The aim of the current research was twofold: (a) to examine the performance of existing Dutch syllabification algorithms, and (b) to investigate whether combining phonetic and orthographic information into a single model can increase syllabification performance. To compare the performance of algorithms, four algorithms (Brandt Corstius, Liang, Trogkanis-Elkan (CRF), and a newly conceived deep-learning model) were applied to three different datasets (dictionary words, loanwords, pseudowords). The algorithms show varying performance across datasets, with the data-driven algorithms outperforming a knowledge-based algorithm in all but one condition. The new deep-learning methods developed led to increased performance compared to the best found in the literature (99.65% word accuracy, a 0.14% improvement). An analysis of the words for which adding phonetic information improved syllabification performance indicates that these were words in which the orthographic ambiguity could be resolved by information on pronunciation. Future research could examine other areas where phonetic information can benefit orthographic processing. In addition, the newly developed deep learning frameworks can be applied to other languages than Dutch.
| Comments: | Published in CLIN Journal |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.28834 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.28834v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28834
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
|
| Journal reference: | Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, Vol. 14 (2025), pp. 365 to 383 |
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Assessing Dutch Syllabification Algorithms and Improving Accuracy by Combining Phonetic and Orthographic Information through Deep Learning, by Gus Lathouwers and 3 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Lightweight Multimodal LLM-Enabled Cost-Effective Defect Grading of Power Transmission Equipment
May 29
-
What are They Thinking? Delineation, Probing and Tracking of Concepts in LLMs
May 29
-
A Modular Architecture for Typologically Controlled Lexicon Generation
May 29
-
MechELK: A Mechanistic Interpretability Framework for Eliciting Latent Knowledge in Large Language Models
May 29
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.