Automated Plagiarism with LLM-remixers [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
An author puts together a number of papers he likes, especially adds the .tex files from arxiv, tells the LLM to look for gaps in the papers, commented out material, and remix them, while avoiding syntactic overlap.
The result is a paper that will pass arxiv's syntactic overlap checks, and can be claimed as novel during a submission.
This has happened many times already, and we are now arguing against LLM-augmented plagiarists.
Welcome to the new age of automated academic ethics collapse.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.