What Do Interaction Representations Actually Measure? Pre-Event Separability in Weakly-Supervised Violence Detection
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Title:What Do Interaction Representations Actually Measure? Pre-Event Separability in Weakly-Supervised Violence Detection
Abstract:Articulated human pose provides detailed body-configuration information beyond coarse spatial relationships, but whether this detail yields greater discriminative information when the downstream pipeline is held fixed remains unclear. We examine this through early violence detection. Holding the tracker, temporal head, supervision, folds, and evaluation fixed, we compare five interaction representations spanning coarse bounding-box geometry, a matched handcrafted pose analogue, enriched pose descriptors, and a matched-capacity encoder learned from raw joints, under video-level evaluation with cluster-bootstrap intervals. No pose-based representation outperforms coarse geometry, though with fifteen anomalous videos this subset cannot rule out small effects. Extending the pipeline to frozen visual encoders, and repeating the comparison on XD-Violence (137 anomalous videos, nine times our UCF-Crime sample), person-crop appearance and whole-frame context both exceed geometry by a wide margin, yet context matches appearance on UCF-Crime and exceeds it on the larger split: cropping to the interacting people yields no advantage over encoding the whole frame. This prompts a direct test of what the benchmark measures. Scoring anomalous videos using only frames preceding the annotated onset, under a control removing sequence length as a cue, retains 39-91% of above-chance separation on both benchmarks, including for seven hand-designed geometric channels. Inspection of the tightest pre-onset windows identifies concrete provenance artifacts: editorial title cards and platform watermarks absent from the surveillance footage supplying the normal class. Video-level AUC here is thus a composite of event evidence and pre-event source cues, a shared source of discrimination that can obscure differences between representations. The diagnostic requires only annotations these benchmarks already ship.
| Subjects: | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.27879 [cs.CV] |
| (or arXiv:2608.27879v1 [cs.CV] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27879
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Submission history
From: Parishruthi Ganesh [view email][v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 03:39:41 UTC (536 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Federating Quantum and Classical Computing: A Privacy-Preserving Hybrid Approach
Sep 23
-
Entropy Can Flow, or It Can Guide. Be Entropy. LEDFlow: Introducing Entropy-guided Generation Order into Uniform Discrete Flow
Sep 23
-
The Probabilistic Structure of Large Language Models
Sep 23
-
Stable Unsupervised Continual Chunking with Sheaf SyncMap
Sep 23
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.