Workshop paper accepted, reviewers asked new experiments [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Hi everyone, I submitted a paper to a workshop co-located with a top conference. The paper was accepted, but reviewers are requesting additional experiments. The issue is that there's no second review phasem, I only need to submit a camera-ready version.
My question is: what's the point of requesting new experiments at this stage? The request essentially bypasses the peer review process entirely.
Has anyone dealt with this situation before? Should I run the experiments anyway, ignore the request, or reach out to the workshop chairs for clarification?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.