arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Sample-Weighted End-to-End Trace-Norm Geometry for Multitask Learning

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.29520 (cs)
[Submitted on 25 Aug 2026]

Title:Sample-Weighted End-to-End Trace-Norm Geometry for Multitask Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Sample-Weighted End-to-End Trace-Norm Geometry for Multitask Learning, by Mahdi Mohammadigohari
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Multitask models combine a shared representation with task-specific outputs, but generalization bounds often control the two components separately. Such products can discard relative orientation and cancellation and can change under equivalent transformations of intermediate coordinates even when the represented predictors are unchanged. We study instead the sample-size-weighted trace norm of the end-to-end map from task coefficients to input-space predictors. For its fixed-radius class, we derive the exact empirical Rademacher complexity. The same quantity is characterized by eliminating a positive-definite task covariance after the representation acts and, in finite-dimensional intermediate spaces, by optimizing the separated product over all equivalent invertible refactorizations. Explicit constructions show unbounded orientation and factorization gaps and an exponential depth gap for cancelling linear layers. As a geometric application, finite-to-one Lipschitz shared maps yield an exact Sobolev task Gram matrix determined by multiplicity and local directional distortion. We evaluate the corresponding convex regularizer in two protocol-locked unseen suites. Across 252 paired held-out comparisons, weighted joint nuclear regularization improves average population excess over unweighted nuclear regularization by 0.00764, with a stratified-bootstrap 95% interval [0.00465, 0.01110]. Correct task counts improve average and least-sampled-quartile excess over shifted counts by 0.01072 and 0.02847; all 15 imbalanced rank-suite cells are positive and the balanced effect is zero. Weighted joint nuclear also outperforms weighted Frobenius and independent ridge. The least-sampled-quartile comparison with unweighted nuclear remains unresolved, delimiting rather than contradicting the average advantage. All seven predeclared gates pass.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.29520 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.29520v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29520
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mahdi Mohammadigohari [view email]
[v1] Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:35:24 UTC (86 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning