Energy-Gated Attention and Wavelet Positional Encoding: Complementary Inductive Biases for Transformer Attention
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Energy-Gated Attention and Wavelet Positional Encoding: Complementary Inductive Biases for Transformer Attention
Abstract:Standard transformer attention computes pairwise token similarity but treats all tokens as equally salient and all positions as equally local, regardless of the informational structure of the input. We identify two complementary inductive biases that standard attention lacks: energy salience (which tokens concentrate informational energy, learned end-to-end without explicit frequency decomposition) and scale-selective locality (how far positional influence extends at each frequency, implemented via Morlet wavelet encoding). We address both with two simple components. Energy-Gated Attention (EGA) gates value aggregation by a learned energy estimate of key token embeddings, computed via a single linear projection; it selects what to attend to. Morlet Positional Encoding (MoPE) replaces fixed sinusoidal encodings with learned Gaussian-windowed wavelets that adapt the joint position-frequency localization to the corpus; it specifies where attention operates at each scale. On TinyShakespeare, EGA alone achieves +0.092 validation loss improvement over standard attention (+0.103 over Phase 1-3 baseline); MoPE alone is -0.032 (below baseline as a standalone encoding); but their combination achieves +0.119 -- more than the sum of parts. This superadditivity, observed across two independent training runs, is the central empirical finding: salience and locality are complementary inductive biases, each addressing a gap the other cannot fill alone. Ablations confirm that structured spectral priors (Morlet wavelet gates, scale-initialized heads, fixed sinusoidal PE) consistently underperform their unconstrained learned counterparts, while complementary learned components interact superadditively. All experiments are at small scale (<=6M parameters, character-level benchmarks, single seed); larger-scale multi-seed validation is the most important direction for future work.
| Comments: | 10 pages, 1 figure, 3 tables. Part 2 of a five-paper series on spectral methods in transformer attention. Code: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Signal Processing (eess.SP) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.26355 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.26355v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.26355
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
GEM: Geometric Entropy Mixing for Optimal LLM Data Curation
May 27
-
The Constraint Tax: Measuring Validity-Correctness Tradeoffs in Structured Outputs for Small Language Models
May 27
-
AirCast-SR: A Foundation Model for Kilometer-Scale Atmospheric Super-Resolution via Latent Consistency Diffusion
May 27
-
SilIF: Silhouette-Augmented Isolation Forest for Unsupervised Transaction Fraud Detection
May 27
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.