Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap
Abstract:Style classifiers can use content cues that correlate with style labels in naturally collected data, yet we lack a systematic way to measure this reliance. We study this problem with a controlled content overlap setup built on parallel Bible translations. Specifically, we define the overlap parameter $\alpha$ as the normalized residual of mutual information between content identity and style label, so that it measures how much content is shared across style classes: from no shared content ($\alpha=0$) to fully shared content ($\alpha=1$). Cross-overlap evaluation of RoBERTa-based classifiers shows that low-overlap models degrade when content cues are removed, while high-overlap models transfer more robustly. A cross-style content retrieval probe further shows that content becomes less recoverable as $\alpha$ increases, with training dynamics showing this removal occurs gradually. Together, these results suggest that controlled overlap provides a simple diagnostic for separating style learning from content shortcuts.
| Comments: | 9 pages |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.07103 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2606.07103v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07103
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
RECAP: Regression Evaluation for Continual Adaptation of Prompts
Jun 8
-
RASFT: Rollout-Adaptive Supervised Fine-Tuning for Reasoning
Jun 8
-
OffQ: Taming Structured Outliers in LLM Quantization by Offsetting
Jun 8
-
DEFINED: A Data-Efficient Computational Framework for Fine-Grained Creativity Assessment in Debate Scenarios
Jun 8
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.