arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.07103 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2026]

Title:Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap

View a PDF of the paper titled Style or Content? Evaluating Style Classifiers with Controlled Content Overlap, by Zhuo Liu and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Style classifiers can use content cues that correlate with style labels in naturally collected data, yet we lack a systematic way to measure this reliance. We study this problem with a controlled content overlap setup built on parallel Bible translations. Specifically, we define the overlap parameter $\alpha$ as the normalized residual of mutual information between content identity and style label, so that it measures how much content is shared across style classes: from no shared content ($\alpha=0$) to fully shared content ($\alpha=1$). Cross-overlap evaluation of RoBERTa-based classifiers shows that low-overlap models degrade when content cues are removed, while high-overlap models transfer more robustly. A cross-style content retrieval probe further shows that content becomes less recoverable as $\alpha$ increases, with training dynamics showing this removal occurs gradually. Together, these results suggest that controlled overlap provides a simple diagnostic for separating style learning from content shortcuts.
Comments: 9 pages
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.07103 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.07103v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07103
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhuo Liu [view email]
[v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 09:53:51 UTC (77 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language