Loss-Conditional PINNs for Parametric PDE Families
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Loss-Conditional PINNs for Parametric PDE Families
Abstract:Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) approximate solutions of ODEs and PDEs by minimising a weighted combination of residual, boundary, initial, and data losses. Their performance is often dominated by the choice of loss weights: a poor weighting can drive training to a degenerate solution in which one physical constraint is satisfied while another is ignored. Existing methods select or adapt a single good set of weights. We take a different view: instead of tuning one weight vector, we explore the entire weight space during training.
We introduce LC-PINN, which adapts the loss-conditional training of Dosovitskiy and Djolonga (2020) to the PDE-residual setting: the conditioning vector (either the loss weights or a scalar physical coefficient) is treated as a network input and sampled from a simple prior at every optimisation step. This turns PINN training into learning a continuous family of solutions indexed by that vector, with no solver-generated paired data. LC-PINN thus lies between classical PINNs and operator learning: it stays fully physics-informed but amortises training over a parametric family. Our contribution is not the loss-conditional construction itself, but its extension to PINNs, the unification of the loss-weight and parametric-coefficient regimes under one architecture (concatenation for loss weights, FiLM for coefficients), and a fixed-quadrature L-BFGS finishing protocol that makes the parametric-coefficient regime trainable.
We give a lambda-invariance result for the conditional optimum and study LC-PINN on parametric Helmholtz, Schrodinger, viscous Burgers, and Buckley-Leverett equations. A single LC-PINN matches or improves retrained per-weight PINN baselines while parameterising the full family in one model, at a total cost that amortises favourably against per-instance retraining.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.04420 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.04420v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04420
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Using Explainable Machine Learning on Clinical Biomarkers: A Multi-Class Classification Study Using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Dataset
Jun 4
-
Novel Aspects of IEEE SA P3109 Arithmetic Formats for Machine Learning
Jun 4
-
Position: Deployed Reinforcement Learning should be Continual
Jun 4
-
Pseudospectral Bounds for Transient Amplification in Coupled Gradient Descent
Jun 4
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.