arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

The Impact of Editorial Intervention on Detecting Native Language Traces

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.10216 (cs)
[Submitted on 11 May 2026 (v1), last revised 22 Jul 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:The Impact of Editorial Intervention on Detecting Native Language Traces

View a PDF of the paper titled The Impact of Editorial Intervention on Detecting Native Language Traces, by Ahmet Yavuz Uluslu and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Native Language Identification (NLI) is the task of determining an author's native language (L1) from their non-native writing. With the advent of human-AI co-authorship, learner texts are routinely corrected and rewritten by large language models, fundamentally altering the linguistic features NLI approaches depend on. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of L1 traces across increasing degrees of editorial intervention. By processing 450 essays from the Write & Improve 2024 (W&I) corpus through varying levels of grammatical error correction and paraphrasing, we demonstrate that L1 attribution does not depend solely on surface-level errors. Instead, the detection models appear to leverage deeper L1-related features, including unidiomatic lexico-semantic choices and pragmatic transfer. We find that minimal edits preserve these structural traces and maintain high L1 attribution accuracy. In contrast, fluency edits and paraphrasing normalize these L1 features, leading to a sharp decline in performance.
Comments: KONVENS 2026
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.10216 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.10216v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.10216
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ahmet Yavuz Uluslu [view email]
[v1] Mon, 11 May 2026 08:58:08 UTC (289 KB)
[v2] Wed, 22 Jul 2026 14:08:45 UTC (663 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language