arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Detecting Speculative Language in Biomedical Texts using Recurrent Neural Tensor Networks

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.10471 (cs)
[Submitted on 9 Jun 2026]

Title:Detecting Speculative Language in Biomedical Texts using Recurrent Neural Tensor Networks

Authors:Dhruv Dixit
View a PDF of the paper titled Detecting Speculative Language in Biomedical Texts using Recurrent Neural Tensor Networks, by Dhruv Dixit
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:In this investigation, we delve into the automated detection of speculative language within biomedical articles by utilizing distributed sentence representations and advanced deep learning techniques. The implications of such identification extend to information retrieval, multi-document summarization, and the exploration of new knowledge. Our exploration encompasses two distinct approaches for acquiring distributed sentence representations: the Paragraph Vector model and the Recursive Neural Tensor Network. These methodologies are then rigorously compared against three foundational baseline algorithms: Support Vector Machines, Naive Bayes, and pattern matching. Our findings reveal that the Recursive Neural Tensor Network (RNTN) demonstrates a slight performance edge (F1 = 0.885) over the top-performing baseline, the linear bigram SVM (F1 = 0.881). Meanwhile, the Paragraph Vector model proves less effective (F1 = 0.368), even after extensive training using an expansive, unlabeled dataset. We engage in a comprehensive discourse on the factors influencing these performance disparities and provide insightful recommendations for future research directions.
Comments: 12 Pages
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.10471 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.10471v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.10471
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Dhruv Dixit [view email]
[v1] Tue, 9 Jun 2026 06:39:31 UTC (357 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language