This is why we need open-source harnesses + local models
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
i've been thinking about this more after trying different agent setups. the model isn't the only thing that determines how well an agent performs. The harness around the model matters a lot too.
With a managed agent setup, you're often giving up control over things like the agent loop, context management, tool execution, retries, and state.
That's fine when you just want something that works. But if we want to actually optimize agents, I think both parts need to be open:
Open-source model + open-source harness.
With local models, you control the model and where the inference happens.
With an open-source harness, you control what happens around the model.
That gives you room to experiment with things like:
how the agent decides what to do next
how much context gets passed to the model
how tools are executed
when to retry or stop
how state is maintained
which model to use for which task
already seeing this separation become more important, nvidia's sol-pi is an interesting example
and i think we're going to see even more optimization happen at the harness/runtime layer, not just at the model layer.
are you running local models with an open-source harness, or do you still prefer managed agent setups?
[link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
NVIDIA shipped OpenShell, an open source sandbox that gives local and open agents real runtime limits instead of prompt rules. Over 100 firms joined the safety stack. OpenAI did not.
Sep 28
-
3090 for $1500???
Sep 28
-
modified qwen 3.8 27b modifies windows credential dumper to bypass EDR detection
Sep 28
-
Minisforum MS-S1 MAX-P495 @ €7.799,00
Sep 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.