r/LocalLLaMA · · 1 min read

gemma-4-12b-it vs Qwen3.5-9B on shared benchmarks: Qwen is overall winner beating gemma in 5/8 benchmarks despite a smaller footprint

Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

gemma-4-12b-it vs Qwen3.5-9B on shared benchmarks: Qwen is overall winner beating gemma in 5/8 benchmarks despite a smaller footprint

I don't really understand the gemma hype. Qwen outperforms gemma gb for gb, and kv cache is lighter. Sure gemma-4-12b-it might be a slight better coder than Qwen3.5-9b, but you could also just use omnicoder-9b (Qwen3.5-9b finetune for coding).

Note: Benchmark results come from the official huggingface model cards; formatted into a table with ChatGPT

submitted by /u/fulgencio_batista
[link] [comments]

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from r/LocalLLaMA