Singularity-aware Optimization via Randomized Geometric Probing: Towards Stable Non-smooth Optimization
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Singularity-aware Optimization via Randomized Geometric Probing: Towards Stable Non-smooth Optimization
Abstract:Deep learning optimization relies heavily on the assumption of smooth loss landscapes, a condition systematically violated by modern architectures due to non-smooth components such as ReLU activations and quantization operators. In such non-smooth regimes, adaptive optimizers such as Adam suffer from gradient chattering, violent oscillations caused by conflicting signals within the Clarke subdifferential, leading to poor convergence and suboptimal generalization. To address this, we introduce Singularity-aware Adam (S-Adam), a novel optimizer that stabilizes training by dynamically modulating step sizes based on local geometric instability. Our key contribution is the Local Geometric Instability (LGI) metric, a computationally efficient estimator of the Clarke subdifferential diameter derived from the variance of randomized directional derivatives. S-Adam incorporates an adaptive damping mechanism exp(-$\lambda$$\rho$) that decelerates updates in high-instability regions while preserving fast convergence in smooth basins. We provide a rigorous convergence analysis using differential inclusions, proving that S-Adam converges almost surely to ($\delta$,$\epsilon$)-Clarke stationary points at the optimal O(1/$\sqrt(T)$) rate. Empirical evaluations on Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) and high-noise small-batch learning demonstrate that S-Adam consistently outperforms AdamW and Prox-SGD, achieving accuracy gains of up to 6 percent on CIFAR-100 and 3 percent on TinyImageNet while effectively mitigating gradient oscillations.
| Comments: | International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2026 |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC) |
| MSC classes: | 68T05, 68W40, 90C30 |
| ACM classes: | F.2.2; I.2.6; I.2.7 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.29547 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2605.29547v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29547
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
One Mask to Rule Them All: On Hidden Facts after Editing and How to Find Them
May 29
-
Representation Signatures and Risk-Feedback Alignment in LLM Trading Agents
May 29
-
Mechanistic origins of catastrophic forgetting: why RL preserves circuits better than SFT?
May 29
-
Molecular Lead Optimization via Agentic Tool Planning
May 29
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.