Towards AI-Assisted Clinical Trial Matching: Practical Considerations, Multicenter Evaluation, and Real-World Deployment
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2609.01202 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 Sep 2026]
Title:Towards AI-Assisted Clinical Trial Matching: Practical Considerations, Multicenter Evaluation, and Real-World Deployment
Authors:Yin Fang, Qiao Jin, Shubo Tian, Lauren He, Maya Geer, Noor Naffakh, Ryan Huu-Tuan Nguyen, Zifeng Wang, Jimeng Sun, Charalampos S. Floudas, James L. Gulley, Kamilia Moalem, Catarina Martins Maia, Amanda Nottke, Juan W. Valle, Melinda Bachini, Lourdes Rocha-Nussbaum, Kari Ramage, Nikita Curry, Megan Barnes, Mandy Mansaray, Darlene Gabeau, Craig E. Grossman, Heath Skinner, Michael Burczynski, NIH-TrialBench Consortium, Zhiyong Lu
View a PDF of the paper titled Towards AI-Assisted Clinical Trial Matching: Practical Considerations, Multicenter Evaluation, and Real-World Deployment, by Yin Fang and 26 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Clinical trials are essential for advancing cancer care and drug development, but many fail because of insufficient patient enrollment. While there is growing interest in using AI to support patient recruitment, existing systems largely perform eligibility assessment alone and have rarely been evaluated in real-world oncology workflows. Here we present TrialGPT 2.0, an AI-assisted clinical trial recommendation system designed for real-world deployment. Rather than asking only whether a patient may qualify, the system also assesses which trials warrant further consideration given the patient's current clinical needs and local workflow priorities, and provides structured, inspectable explanations for expert review. Importantly, we evaluated TrialGPT 2.0 retrospectively and prospectively across multiple oncology-focused settings, spanning government, academic cancer-center, patient-advocacy, and NIH referral workflows. In retrospective multicenter cohorts comprising 288 cases, TrialGPT 2.0 retrieved at least one clinician-recommended trial in its top 10 recommendations for approximately 91% of cases while reducing clinician screening time by 55.0%. In a six-month prospective evaluation embedded in an active precision oncology tumor board, TrialGPT 2.0 contributed additional trial opportunities missed by the routine workflow, expanding patient access to clinical trial participation by 90.9%. To support scientific reproducibility, we also introduce NIH-TrialBench, a clinician-authored dataset comprising 126 diverse synthetic patient vignettes and matching scenarios from 11 NIH Institutes and Centers. Together, these results support the value of AI to assist clinical trial matching by improving clinician efficiency and identifying frequently overlooked trial opportunities, ultimately helping to expand and accelerate accrual to cancer trials.
| Comments: | 43 pages, 12 figures |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.01202 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.01202v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01202
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Towards AI-Assisted Clinical Trial Matching: Practical Considerations, Multicenter Evaluation, and Real-World Deployment, by Yin Fang and 26 other authors
Current browse context:
cs.CL
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Learn Your Own Thoughts: Abstract Token Curriculum
Sep 18
-
Uni-LaDiR: Latent Diffusion Unifies Multimodal Reasoning
Sep 18
-
MATCH: Model-Aware Tool Learning with Curriculum Scheduling and Hierarchically Gated Rewards
Sep 18
-
Modality Discrepancy Transformer for Ambivalence and Hesitancy Recognition
Sep 18
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.