MiMo 2.5 Q6 vs DS 3.2 Q8 vs GLM 5.1 Q8

For 2 months or so I had been using GLM Q5, recently upgraded to Q8, which was an improvement.

Use case is Fiction

I finally got around to trying DS 3.2 after months of not. good in a different way (starting to naturally get longer responses with the same inputs), creative, but there are different composition issues (extra, great amount of adjectives) with DS.

I tried MiMo 2.5 Q6...and holy crap. Improved narrative flow, tone. of course still has some of the usual LLMisms, but to a degree I see slightly less of self-inflicted LLMism stylistic deadending. Its more along the lines of having a level of quality that is sufficient to generate the larger work, and then cleanup the -isms at the end, vs having to worry about the previous output lightly tainting your very next gen perpetually.

MiMo is a big step up from 5.1 for me. I was a big time GLM lover for a few months, but MiMo might my new favorite.

I will experiment with DS 4 soon. Looks like llama.cpp doesn't guy support it yet is the main thing slowing me down from trying it.