arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Beyond Final-Token Classification: Heterogeneous Readouts for Evidence-Grounded Suicide Risk Detection

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.22767 (cs)
[Submitted on 19 Sep 2026]

Title:Beyond Final-Token Classification: Heterogeneous Readouts for Evidence-Grounded Suicide Risk Detection

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Final-Token Classification: Heterogeneous Readouts for Evidence-Grounded Suicide Risk Detection, by Zirui Li and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The IEEE BigData Cup benchmark combines three prediction problems with different output structures: ordinal suicide-risk classification, multi-label psychosocial factor detection, and extraction of supporting phrases. We introduce heterogeneous readout decomposition (HRD), which separates semantic verification from output realization. A locally deployed Qwen3.8-27B model, adapted with task-specific QLoRA adapters, produces both answer-token margins and layer-63 answer states for card-conditioned queries. HRD compares four latent scores for ordinal risk, retains token margins for most factors while routing seven labels through one shared latent probe, and constructs evidence sets from verbatim span candidates with calibrated, risk-conditional constraints. On two held-out user-grouped confirmation folds, the latent risk readout improves weighted F1 from 0.8237 to 0.8372 and macro F1 from 0.7965 to 0.8185. Selective factor routing improves macro F1 by 0.0105 and tail-label macro F1 by 0.0189; in contrast, global latent replacement and independent label-specific probes fail. The constrained evidence decoder raises pooled phrase F1 from 0.7488 to 0.7609 in row-level out-of-fold evaluation. Lenormand's best public result is 0.8052 on Subtask 1 and 0.6636 on Subtask 2, giving a composite score of 0.7627. These results identify the answer-token boundary, rather than semantic representation alone, as a measurable source of error in this benchmark.
Comments: Competition paper for the IEEE Big Data Cup 2026. Ranked 2nd among 31 participating teams and invited for submission to IEEE Big Data 2026
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.22767 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.22767v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22767
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yanling Li [view email]
[v1] Sat, 19 Sep 2026 05:01:17 UTC (56 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Final-Token Classification: Heterogeneous Readouts for Evidence-Grounded Suicide Risk Detection, by Zirui Li and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language