When Denser Credit Is Not Enough: Evidence-Calibrated Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Training
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:When Denser Credit Is Not Enough: Evidence-Calibrated Policy Optimization for Long-Horizon LLM Agent Training
Abstract:Long-horizon LLM agents require reinforcement learning methods that can assign credit to intermediate decisions under sparse and delayed rewards. Recent group-based methods such as GiGPO improve over GRPO by constructing step-level advantages at repeated anchor states. However, we show that such dense credit can be statistically unreliable: under limited rollouts, rare but lucky actions may receive overly large advantages, producing divergent anchor bias and late-stage training oscillation. We propose Evidence-Calibrated Policy Optimization (ECPO), a critic-free policy optimization algorithm that calibrates step-level credit before policy updates. ECPO combines Evidence-Calibrated Action Advantage, which groups rollouts by canonical actions and shrinks low-count estimates, with Variance-Gated Credit Weighting, which suppresses anchor states dominated by within-action noise. Experiments on ALFWorld and WebShop with Qwen2.5-1.5B/7B show that ECPO consistently outperforms strong baselines, improving GiGPO by +5.2/+7.3 success points on ALFWorld/WebShop with Qwen2.5-1.5B while adding only 0.1% additional advantage-computation overhead.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.05885 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.05885v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05885
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
The Evaluation Blind Spot: A Stereological Theory of Benchmark Coverage for Large Language Models
Jun 5
-
ERRORQUAKE: Heavy-Tailed Error Severity Distributions in Open-Weight Large Language Models
Jun 5
-
Staged Factorial Screening for Budget-Constrained Micro-Pretraining
Jun 5
-
PyCC.id: A package for hypothesis-driven equation discovery with structural identifiability
Jun 5
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.