PersLitEval: Fine-grained Benchmark and Evaluation of LLMs on Persian Literature Questions
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:PersLitEval: Fine-grained Benchmark and Evaluation of LLMs on Persian Literature Questions
Abstract:Despite impressive multilingual capabilities, large language models (LLMs) remain poorly evaluated on literary knowledge in non-English languages. We introduce PersLitEval, a benchmark of 4,514 Persian literature multiple-choice questions across eight fine-grained categories spanning spelling, literary devices, grammar, vocabulary, word formation, and conceptual understanding, sourced from materials for the Konkur university entrance examination. We evaluate six LLMs across ten prompting strategies, revealing striking category-level disparities across three tiers of task difficulty: models reach higher accuracy on conceptual similarity tasks but struggle with formal linguistic analysis, with spelling and word formation proving the hardest across all models. Prompting strategy has a significant impact on performance, with explained few-shot examples yielding the best results, particularly on formal linguistic categories. An error analysis identifies three failure modes: semantic comprehension gaps, formal linguistic knowledge gaps, and counting/enumeration errors, suggesting that different categories require different improvement strategies.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.27015 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.27015v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27015
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Self-Verified Distillation: Your Language Model Is Secretly Its Own Synthetic Data Pipeline
May 27
-
Pretraining Data Exposure in Large Language Models: A Survey of Membership Inference, Data Contamination, and Security Implications
May 27
-
SPEAR: Code-Augmented Agentic Prompt Optimization
May 27
-
CroCo: Cross-Lingual Contrastive Preference Tuning on Self-Generations
May 27
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.