How papers are selected for Best Paper, Oral, or Highlight presentation at major ML/CV conferences such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, NeurIPS, and ICLR? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
From what I understand, reviewers usually do not directly vote for these categories or nominate papers themselves. So how does the selection process typically work?
Here are specific questions I wonder
- Who actually selects the candidates: ACs, SACs, program chairs, award committees, or a separate committee?
- Do ACs or committees read the camera-ready version, or is the decision based on the originally submitted/reviewed version?
- Is the selection mostly based on reviewer scores, or do factors like novelty, impact, and discussion among ACs play a bigger role?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]
Aug 14
-
Building text to ASCII diffusion model , need advice and guidance [P]
Aug 14
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.