Deep Reinforcement Learning on Item-Compatibility Graphs for One-Dimensional Bin Packing
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Deep Reinforcement Learning on Item-Compatibility Graphs for One-Dimensional Bin Packing
Abstract:The one-dimensional bin packing problem (1D-BPP) is a classical NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem with applications ranging from logistics and manufacturing to cloud resource management. Although deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has become a competitive paradigm for data-driven optimization, most learned packing methods target 2D and 3D variants, and intelligent learned solvers for 1D-BPP remain scarce. In this paper, we present a novel end-to-end, size-agnostic graph reinforcement learning framework for 1D-BPP. We formulate the packing process as a Markov decision process on an item-compatibility graph, serving as a structural knowledge representation in which every action merges two partial bins that fit together. A graph neural network actor-critic policy extracts relational features from this representation and is trained through reinforcement learning and decoded by stochastic beam search, enabling a single trained model to generalize zero-shot to instances of any size. We conduct a systematic empirical study across graph encoders, DRL algorithms, reward functions, training distributions, and hyperparameters. Evaluated zero-shot on the full BPPLIB benchmark against a constructive heuristic, a grouping genetic algorithm, and recent learned methods, our data-driven policy lowers the mean optimality gap of the constructive heuristic from 2.66\% to 2.31\%, with the largest gains on structured instances. Against learned baselines evaluated on the same benchmark, it attains a lower gap on most of the nine families and is far more stable across instance distributions. On the hardest benchmark family, it outperforms a state-of-the-art learned solver that relies on column generation and integer programming, while using no solver at all. A grouping genetic algorithm remains ahead overall, and we analyze where and why the residual gap arises.
| Comments: | 29 pages,3 figures, 8 tables |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.25397 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2609.25397v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.25397
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Federating Quantum and Classical Computing: A Privacy-Preserving Hybrid Approach
Sep 23
-
Entropy Can Flow, or It Can Guide. Be Entropy. LEDFlow: Introducing Entropy-guided Generation Order into Uniform Discrete Flow
Sep 23
-
The Probabilistic Structure of Large Language Models
Sep 23
-
Stable Unsupervised Continual Chunking with Sheaf SyncMap
Sep 23
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.