Discussion About Meta-Review Issue Report in ARR Cycle [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
So guys, this is one of the discussions that I wanted to engage in for sometime now.
Based on your personal experience in the ARR cycles, I want you guys to share your experience on your meta reviews especially if you have filed a meta-review issue report in the same in the past cycles of your paper and if this thing has actually brought some changes into the acceptance rate of the conferences like EMNLP etc..
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.