arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

The Hallucination Signal Is a Mean Shift: Why Simple Probes Suffice

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.28930 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Aug 2026]

Title:The Hallucination Signal Is a Mean Shift: Why Simple Probes Suffice

View a PDF of the paper titled The Hallucination Signal Is a Mean Shift: Why Simple Probes Suffice, by Jungseob Lee and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Hidden-state probes effectively detect LLM hallucinations, but the geometry of the signal remains poorly characterized, driving increasingly complex probe architectures. Across three 7B-scale models and three datasets in a paired-example paradigm, we find the signal overwhelmingly dominated by a single mean-shift component, and removing this direction collapses detection to chance. Shrinkage linear discriminant analysis closes about 73% of the gap between 1D and full-dimensional classifiers, so apparent architectural complexity largely reflects high-dimensional covariance estimation difficulty rather than exploitable non-linearity. A simple L2-regularized logistic regression (0.952 AUROC) bounds or outperforms twelve controlled architectural alternatives, and our multi-layer aggregation exceeds CLAP cross-layer attention probing under matched paradigm. Because the signal spans a contiguous layer band, LayerMix aggregates it to match oracle-layer performance without oracle access. Our claims characterize the geometry within the controlled paired-example paradigm. Our code is available at this https URL.
Comments: 19 pages, 7 figures, 20 tables. Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference). Code: this https URL
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.28930 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.28930v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28930
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jungseob Lee [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 23:01:21 UTC (206 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language