arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Robust Conformal Consensus: Multi-Agent LLM-as-a-Judge Interval Evaluation with Conformal Prediction

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.06367 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Sep 2026]

Title:Robust Conformal Consensus: Multi-Agent LLM-as-a-Judge Interval Evaluation with Conformal Prediction

Authors:Lihui Liu
View a PDF of the paper titled Robust Conformal Consensus: Multi-Agent LLM-as-a-Judge Interval Evaluation with Conformal Prediction, by Lihui Liu
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:LLM-as-a-Judge has emerged as a promising paradigm for evaluating natural language generation. However, the uncertainty associated with such evaluations remains largely unexplored, which limits their reliability in real-world applications. Although conformal prediction offers a principled framework for uncertainty quantification, existing approaches typically apply it to a single LLM judge, overlooking the variability introduced by using different LLM evaluators. In this work, we propose a robust uncertainty estimation framework for multi-agent LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation. Our approach constructs conformal prediction intervals for LLM-based scores from multiple LLMs. By considering intervals from different LLM judges, we obtain more stable and reliable uncertainty estimates. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method produces valid prediction intervals with coverage guarantees, and that interval-based aggregation across multiple judges leads to more stable evaluation outcomes.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.06367 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.06367v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.06367
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Lihui Liu [view email]
[v1] Sun, 6 Sep 2026 03:55:09 UTC (7,208 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning