I don’t think ML is worth learning [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Context: I work with finance and ai systems and have been learnings ML the last month or 2.
I could be severely wrong and if you think that I would love to know why and how I can learn/do what ai can’t. But my thought is ai can apply ML to an application as good as any engineer, the difference is how you prepare the data for the ai to act on.
So would I not be better off learning how to prepare the data for ai effectively ?
Thank you
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
-
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Aug 13
-
Reproducible canvas-aligned low-level patterns in somerandomllm-generated images and their possible relation to iterative editing artifacts [D]
Aug 13
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.