Recognition and Label-Free Adaptation Across Recording Sessions in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Recognition and Label-Free Adaptation Across Recording Sessions in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding
Abstract:Recognition accuracy obtained during a recording session does not persist when a user puts on the electrodes again after the electrodes had previously been removed. The electrodes may have moved slightly, the skin may be drier or wetter, or the elbow may be positioned differently; these factors all contribute to day-to-day variability and therefore represent a major obstacle to implementing successful pattern-recognition based myoelectric control systems in daily practice. However, simply recalibrating a user's hand for 20 min at every doff/don event is a clearly unrealistic expectation. A montage-agnostic encoder built for cross-user, cross-montage transfer is trained here using data collected during a particular recording session, and then applied to data collected later in a different recording session without adjusting anything, on the ten intact subjects of NinaPro DB6. The performance of this approach is compared to that of a per-user LDA classification pipeline, and to that of two published approaches that only rely on source data collected from the same recording session. Carried unchanged across recording sessions, the encoder retains 0.688 macro-F1 against 0.540 for the per-user pipeline, and, on the per-window metric the published baselines use, sits above both published source-only results, a band of two points that locates the encoder rather than ranking it. Of five label-free test-time adaptations, only feature-statistic alignment improves every subject; batch-normalisation re-estimation, a standard method in the domain-adaptation literature, collapses this architecture entirely. Aligning the encoder's feature statistics to the new session recovers about what a single labelled calibration repetition would.
| Comments: | 23 pages, 6 figures, 6 tables |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.6; I.5.4; J.3 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.27568 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2607.27568v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27568
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
MS-MLB: An Open Machine Learning Benchmark for Blood-Based MS Classification
Aug 7
-
When Do Corrective Features Help? An Agent for Corrective Feature Discovery on Black-Box Forecasters
Aug 7
-
PPDL: LLM-Based Flows as Probabilistic Programs
Aug 7
-
Decoupling Perception from Description: Computation-Grounded Representation Alignment between Multivariate Time Series and Language
Aug 7
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.