arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.06196 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Jul 2026]

Title:Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability

Authors:Alicia Parrish, Rajat Shinde, Sanket Badhe, Xinyi Bai, Sree Bhargavi Balija, Hua-Rong Chu, Emilio Ferrara, Armstrong Foundjem, Rajat Ghosh, Aakash Gupta, Xuanli He, Ong Chen Hui, Minji Jung, Madhangi Karimanal, Faiza Khan Khattak, Boryoung Kim, Eugenia Kim, Liliya Lavitas, Seok Min Lim, Victor Lu, Jim Moirangthem, Dhivya Nagasubramanian, Deepak Pandita, Sita Rajagopal, Geetha Raju, Evgeniia Razumovskaia, Aravind Reddy, Federico Ricciuti, Nobin Sarwar, Sungpil Shin, Sunayana Sitaram, Snehal Thorat, Tharindu Cyril Weerasooriya, Jasmijn Bastings, Joachim Baumann, Kongtao Chen, Murali Emani, Mariya Hendriksen, Jiho Jin, Jun Seong Kim, Younghoon Ko, Alicja Kwasniewska, Minjae Lee, Tom Wei-cyuan Lin Kashyap Ramanandula Manjusha, Junho Myung, Junyeong Park, Roma Patel, Shyam Ratan, Sudarsun Santhiappan, Priyanka Suresh, Tuesday, Ksheeraj Sai Vepuri Laura Amortegui-Ordonez, Claire Dennis, Minsuk Kahng, Chris Knotz, Alice Oh, Balaraman Ravindran, Soojung Ryu William Bartholomew, Hiwot Tesfaye, Lora Aroyo
View a PDF of the paper titled Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability, by Alicia Parrish and 59 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Current AI safety evaluation and benchmarking frameworks predominantly rely on Western-centric culture-agnostic defaults that mask critical regional laws, socio-linguistic nuances, and cultural taboos, leaving Vision-Language Models (VLMs) vulnerable in global deployments. We introduce Pluralis v0.1: a novel multimodal, multi-regional, and multilingual dataset built from a culture-first perspective. Spanning 6,448 prompts across six Asia-Pacific countries (Bangladesh, India, Korea, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan) and eight languages, Pluralis diverges from prior work by natively sourcing localized safety hazards rather than adapting Western datasets. Crucially, it introduces a multimodal evaluation paradigm: user text (e.g., "Should I gift this?") and an image referring to "this" (e.g., a clock) - both innocuous in isolation, but synergistically triggering specific legal or cultural violations. Pluralis disentangles universal safety violations from localized cultural appropriateness, establishing the latter as a first-class evaluation axis. To operationalize this, we present Judge-Pluralis, an agreement-gated LLM-as-a-Judge ensemble trained on examples classified in an empirically derived cultural taxonomy. Observing VLM behavior on a subset of the Pluralis surfaces recurring, locale-specific failure modes such as image misidentifications with downstream harm, missed item-context-locale interactions, and inadequate refusals. These failure modes vary systematically across locales and languages, exposing blind spots that globally averaged metrics conceal. Ultimately, Pluralis is not presented as a solved evaluation framework for cultural alignment, but rather as a first step and catalyst for future innovation. We call upon the research community to utilize this foundation to advance the science of multilingual, multicultural evaluation to better support AI cultural alignment globally.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.06196 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.06196v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.06196
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jasmijn Bastings [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Jul 2026 12:21:52 UTC (5,684 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Pluralis v0.1: Towards a Multicultural, Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for AI Risk and Reliability, by Alicia Parrish and 59 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language