How Quantization Changes Interpretable Features: A Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Language Models
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:How Quantization Changes Interpretable Features: A Sparse Autoencoder Analysis of Language Models
Abstract:Quantization is a standard path to deploying large language models, and a quantized model is typically judged acceptable when its perplexity or downstream accuracy stays close to the full-precision original. Whether the model still computes in the same way, or whether the interpretable features identified in the full-precision model survive weight rounding, is rarely tested, even as safety audits and steering interventions increasingly rely on those features. We ask whether sparse autoencoder (SAE) features extracted from a dense full-precision model remain faithful once that model is quantized. Using a frozen SAE as a fixed measurement basis, we encode full-precision and round-to-nearest (RTN) quantized activations on identical tokens and quantify per-feature survival by Pearson correlation, sweeping bit-widths from INT8 to INT4 on Pythia-70M and Gemma-2-2B. We find that feature survival is graded: features degrade systematically rather than failing all at once, with 62.4 percent of active features surviving at INT6 on Pythia-70M and 51.3 percent surviving at INT6 on Gemma-2-2B, and with most non-survivors blurred rather than destroyed. Survival is predictable from full-precision statistics alone, with cross-validated AUCs of 0.92 to 0.97 and peak activation as the strongest marginal predictor. Critically, task metrics can miss this damage: on Gemma-2-2B, INT7 improves perplexity while degrading 18.7 percent of features. Finally, quantization and matched-perplexity magnitude pruning damage strongly overlapping feature sets, with Jaccard overlap of 0.79 to 0.86 and damage-score Spearman correlation of 0.98, suggesting a shared mode of compression-induced vulnerability. These results show that behavioral parity is insufficient evidence that interpretability findings transfer to quantized deployments, motivating feature-level audits of compression.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.03002 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.03002v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03002
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Human-in-the-Loop Contextual Bandits for Short-Term Rental Dynamic Pricing: Structural Equivalence of Historical Warm-Up and Approval-Gated Live Learning
Jun 3
-
Spectral Asymptotics of Neural Network Loss Landscapes: An Exact Decomposition of the Curvature Exponent
Jun 3
-
Making Brain-Computer Interfaces More Secure
Jun 3
-
Assessing Region-Level EEG Contributions to Cognitive Workload Prediction
Jun 3
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.