RSI is not happening [R]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
A new paper (I'm not a coauthor BTW -- I just found it interesting) argues, basically, that RSI is not on the horizon, because current (at the time the study was done) agents cannot do open-ended ML research.
Specifically, they took some accepted, but unpublished papers from NeurIPS, and tried to get the agents to do the same work, which was then graded by the original authors. And the agents (Codex/GPT-5.6 Sol and OpenClaw/Opus 4.8) could not do it.
And since they cannot do open-ended ML research, they cannot recursively self-improve -- this is their argument.
Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27191
I think I've regretted the last 10 or so times I posted any kind of "research" in this subreddit -- either people downvote it, or it gets upvoted, but there is zero meaningful discussion. This might be the last time I'm trying this.
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
Qwen3-VL 8B on a laptop vs Opus 5.5 / Sonnet 5 / GPT-5.6 on 137 messy documents: beat GPT-5.6 on tax forms, lost badly on Indian date formats[R]
Sep 28
-
How can I turn an industry ML project into a publication? [R]
Sep 28
-
Are there any good research papers around Text clustering using LLMs [R]
Sep 28
-
Free, open-source AI engineering course where you build each algorithm by hand: 523 lessons, now as EPUB/PDF books [P]
Sep 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.