arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Study

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.29144 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Aug 2026]

Title:Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Study

View a PDF of the paper titled Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Study, by Jiaxiang Liu and 11 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Synthetic data generation has become a cornerstone for advancing large language models. However, the lack of the quantitative analysis for error tolerance became a critical bottleneck. Consequently, current filtering strategies fluctuate between two extremes: they are either overly aggressive, risking the exclusion of potentially valuable samples, or overly permissive, failing to eliminate erroneous samples effectively. To bridge this gap, this paper introduces Atomic Tree Operation Modeling (ATOM), a framework that decomposes data into functional units ($f(x)\rightarrow y$). ATOM distinguishes benign Operand $x$ perturbations from fatal Operator $f$ perturbations. The former are needlessly discarded by aggressive filtering, while the latter slip through permissive filtering. Our experiments reveal a double dissociation: models are robust to operand perturbations but collapse under operator perturbations. By prioritizing operator over aggressive operand precision, our ATOM-synthesized data outperforms rigorous baselines (e.g., +3.1% gain over LIMA), suggesting that operator diversity matters more than operand precision. Our code is available at this https URL.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.29144 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.29144v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29144
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jiax Liu [view email]
[v1] Sat, 29 Aug 2026 08:41:58 UTC (2,566 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Quantifying Error Tolerance in Synthetic Data: An Atomic-level Operand vs. Operator Perturbation Study, by Jiaxiang Liu and 11 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language