Information-Based Calibration of Uncertainty Quantification in Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title:Information-Based Calibration of Uncertainty Quantification in Product-of-Experts Gaussian Process Models
Abstract:Gaussian process (GP) regression with a single global GP (GP-glo) incurs cubic computational cost, limiting scalability to large datasets. Product-of-experts GP models (GP-pro), which combine local GP models to capture global correlations, alleviate this computational burden. However, training local experts on disjoint data subsets can lead to overestimated posterior variances. We propose GP-pro-c, a product-of-experts GP model that calibrates these variances using an information-based method. The method exploits the monotonicity and submodularity of information gain in GPs to define a calibration ratio that reduces the posterior variance of individual local GP models. We evaluate GP-pro-c using negative log-likelihood (NLL), root mean squared error (RMSE), and expected normalised calibration error (ENCE). Experiments on four synthetic functions and six regression datasets show that GP-pro-c achieves average reductions of 2.3% in NLL and 12.0% in ENCE compared with the uncalibrated GP-pro model. The proposed method mitigates posterior variance overestimation while maintaining predictive accuracy and reducing computational complexity. GP-pro-c provides a promising approach for uncertainty estimation in scalable GP models and may serve as a useful surrogate model for Bayesian optimisation with high-dimensional and large-scale data.
| Comments: | Published in the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Volume 86 (2026) |
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.29349 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2608.29349v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29349
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
|
| Journal reference: | Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Vol. 86 (2026) |
| Related DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.20374
DOI(s) linking to related resources
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
AhaBench: Do Agents Learn from Prior Experience? A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Continual Learning
Sep 10
-
When Do Options Help? Policy Necrosis and Redundant Coverage in Option-Critic
Sep 10
-
Multi-granularity Adaptive Hypergraph Representation Learning via Granular-ball
Sep 10
-
Capsule Lens: Locating and Tracking Concept Geometry in Model Representations
Sep 10
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.