Bias in Filter Feature Selection Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis of Datasets, Baselines, and Experimental Design Choices
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2606.07068 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2026]
Title:Bias in Filter Feature Selection Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis of Datasets, Baselines, and Experimental Design Choices
View a PDF of the paper titled Bias in Filter Feature Selection Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis of Datasets, Baselines, and Experimental Design Choices, by Malick Ebiele and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Background: Since 1990 many feature selection methods have been proposed across heterogeneous applications. To validate the usefulness of a new method, it needs to be compared against at least one baseline method from the existing literature on a feature selection task using at least one dataset. Recent developments in tabular Deep Learning (DL) and data valuation in Machine Learning (ML) suggest that the evaluation of new methods, algorithms, and models may be consciously or unconsciously biased. We hypothesise that a similar trend exists in feature selection (FS), particularly in filter feature selection (FFS). The aim of this study is therefore to examine FFS studies to identify factors that influence the evaluation and that might consist entry point for biases in order to recommend stronger principles for FFS evaluation.
Methods: We analyse a sample of 28 high profile FFS studies published between 1994 and 2025. The analysis provides reflections on how to examine FFS studies, highlights lessons learned throughout the process, and gives five evidence-based recommendations for future FFS evaluation.
Results: Multivariate Linear Regression analysis achieved a score of $R^2=0.33$. It means that 33% of the variance in the performance of new methods against chosen baselines (win rate) is explained by the number of datasets (#Datasets), the number of baselines (#Baselines), and the number of new methods (#NewMethods).
Discussion: $R^2=0.33$ is considered medium explanation; which is promising given that this is the first such study. The medium explanation result is due to the fact that win rate is influenced by additional factors such as the maturity of the feature selection domain, the type of datasets and baselines, and the simplicity of the regression model used to explain the relationship.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| MSC classes: | 68T01, 68T20 |
| ACM classes: | I.5.2; I.1.2; H.1.1 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2606.07068 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2606.07068v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07068
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Bias in Filter Feature Selection Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis of Datasets, Baselines, and Experimental Design Choices, by Malick Ebiele and 2 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Elmes*: Automated Construction of Fine-Grained Evaluation Rubrics for Large Language Models in Long-Tail Educational Scenarios
Jun 8
-
FAIR-Calib: Frontier-Aware Instability-Reweighted Calibration for Post-Training Quantization of Diffusion Large Language Models
Jun 8
-
Multi-Scale Feature Attention Network for Polymer Classification using THz Dual-Comb Spectroscopy
Jun 8
-
MacArena: Benchmarking Computer Use Agents on an Online macOS Environment
Jun 8
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.