Conference Reviews: Asking Too Much? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
There's a kind of review that asks for lengthy additions, usually extending the scope of the paper beyond the stated, even though the submission is at page limit. Naturally, such additions in the case of top-tier conferences have to go into the supplemental materials or appendices.
My question here is, would not such additions make the paper more suitable for a journal publication? I had to retract one paper out of such concern that the conference publication would block the later planned journal publication.
Any opinions?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
trying to build a solid math library for stats/ML/DL, need a sanity check on my picks[D]
Aug 17
-
We’ve got a workshop on production retrieval-augmented generation with open models, benchmarked end to end, thought it’d be relevant here [D]
Aug 17
-
ICLR numbered citations possible? [R]
Aug 17
-
How to make any Sparse Attention / KV Compression look good? [D] [R]
Aug 17
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.