Conference Reviews: Asking Too Much? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
There's a kind of review that asks for lengthy additions, usually extending the scope of the paper beyond the stated, even though the submission is at page limit. Naturally, such additions in the case of top-tier conferences have to go into the supplemental materials or appendices.
My question here is, would not such additions make the paper more suitable for a journal publication? I had to retract one paper out of such concern that the conference publication would block the later planned journal publication.
Any opinions?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
Kimi K3 Deep Dive — Architecture, Training & Benchmarks of the 2.78-Trillion-Parameter Open-Weight Model [D]
Aug 2
-
Looking for the right pipeline to convert academic textbook figures into interactive/editable assets [R]
Aug 2
-
ARR August Cycle [D]
Aug 2
-
No replies to rebuttals and comments even by AC [D]
Aug 2
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.