chance for 2.5 for eacl findings[D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Here are the scores, 2/2.5/3, with all confidence 3. We addressed everyone's concerns, but none of the reviewers have replied yet. Does anyone know if reviewers are allowed to just rehash limitations already discussed in the paper or not? It feels a little weird because we know these are limitations and they are not super easy to refute because we do agree with them and we did mention them in the paper. Also, does the AC take the rebuttal into count if no reviewers respond or not?
What is the chance for EACL findings?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
How can I turn an industry ML project into a publication? [R]
Sep 28
-
Are there any good research papers around Text clustering using LLMs [R]
Sep 28
-
Free, open-source AI engineering course where you build each algorithm by hand: 523 lessons, now as EPUB/PDF books [P]
Sep 28
-
Two-stage shelf audit: YOLO finds the products, embeddings can't tell sibling SKUS apart. What should Stage 2 be? [P]
Sep 27
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.