Would a 2000-2021 ML paper even get accepted today? [D]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
I keep hearing some version of this:
“A paper that got accepted years ago wouldn’t stand a chance today.”
Honestly, for a lot of ML subfields, this doesn’t sound crazy anymore.
A paper that once looked solid can now look under-evaluated, under-ablated, weak on baselines, or just too obvious.
So maybe the real claim is:
A mediocre accepted ML paper from years ago would probably get rejected today.
Do people agree? Has the bar actually gone up, or has the field just become more crowded and more competitive?
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
Curious: Do you prefer buying GPUs or renting them for finetuning/training models?[D]
May 14
-
OpenAI's deployment company move says more about the AI gap than any benchmark[D]
May 14
-
Rare event prediction on time series that change structure mid-stream? [D]
May 14
-
Integrating 3D Heat Equation into a PINN for Real-Time Aerospace Simulation (C++ WASM Engine)[P]
May 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.