Differences in Typological Alignment in Language Models' Treatment of Differential Argument Marking
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Differences in Typological Alignment in Language Models' Treatment of Differential Argument Marking
Abstract:Recent work has shown that language models (LMs) trained on synthetic corpora can exhibit typological preferences that resemble cross-linguistic regularities in human languages, particularly for syntactic phenomena such as word order. In this paper, we extend this paradigm to differential argument marking (DAM), a semantic licensing system in which morphological marking depends on semantic prominence. Using a controlled synthetic learning method, we train GPT-2 models on 18 corpora implementing distinct DAM systems and evaluate their generalization using minimal pairs. Our results reveal a dissociation between two typological dimensions of DAM. Models reliably exhibit human-like preferences for natural markedness direction, favoring systems in which overt marking targets semantically atypical arguments. In contrast, models do not reproduce the strong object preference in human languages, in which overt marking in DAM more often targets objects rather than subjects. These findings suggest that different typological tendencies may arise from distinct underlying sources.
| Comments: | 16 pages, 8 figures, 7 tables. To appear at CoNLL 2026 |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2602.17653 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2602.17653v2 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.17653
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Iskar Deng [view email][v1] Thu, 19 Feb 2026 18:56:34 UTC (282 KB)
[v2] Thu, 21 May 2026 21:16:25 UTC (180 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Evaluating Large Language Models in a Complex Hidden Role Game
May 25
-
A Survey of Text and Speech Resources for Hausa and Fongbe: Availability, Quality, and Gaps for NLP Development
May 25
-
Query-Adaptive Semantic Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Dynamic Strategy with Contextual Window Expansion
May 25
-
Knowledge Distillation for Low-Resource Open-source Text-to-SQL Model
May 25
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.