arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

PhysioBench: A Unified Benchmark for Physiological Signal Question Answering

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.20836 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 Jul 2026]

Title:PhysioBench: A Unified Benchmark for Physiological Signal Question Answering

View a PDF of the paper titled PhysioBench: A Unified Benchmark for Physiological Signal Question Answering, by Mengxuan Li and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Physiological signals support diverse clinical and monitoring tasks, yet existing physiological signal foundation models typically require task-specific adaptation for each task. Natural language provides a common interface for specifying different prediction objectives, but the ability of current models to follow such instructions across physiological signal modalities remains insufficiently evaluated. To address this gap, we introduce PhysioBench, a unified benchmark for physiological signal question answering. PhysioBench harmonizes annotations from 22 public datasets into 61.4 million questions across 30 tasks. Each question-answer pair is grounded in a signal segment and traceable to its source annotation. We evaluate 21 representative models, including large language models, vision-language models, time-series language models, and physiological signal foundation models under three complementary settings. The results show that none of the evaluated models achieves consistently strong performance across physiological signal modalities and tasks. The incorporation of natural language supports unified prediction across tasks, although performance remains sensitive to question formulation. Beyond these findings, PhysioBench offers an extensible platform for fine-grained analysis and future research on physiological signal understanding. Our codes are available at this https URL.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.20836 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.20836v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20836
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Mengxuan Li [view email]
[v1] Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:25:47 UTC (3,040 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language