arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Revisiting Observation Reduction for Web Agents: Comprehensive Evaluation with a Lightweight Framework

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.29397 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 May 2026]

Title:Revisiting Observation Reduction for Web Agents: Comprehensive Evaluation with a Lightweight Framework

View a PDF of the paper titled Revisiting Observation Reduction for Web Agents: Comprehensive Evaluation with a Lightweight Framework, by Masafumi Enomoto and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:HTML observations in LLM-based web agents are extremely long, and while many reduction methods have been proposed, it remains unclear which methods reduce overall agent latency while maintaining performance. The main obstacle is the high cost of end-to-end evaluation: in our experiments, evaluating 11 methods across 32 configurations on 33 tasks of WorkArena L1 required 232.4 cumulative hours. To address this, we propose a lightweight evaluation framework based on the Minimal Failure Set (MFS), the minimal set of HTML elements whose removal causes task failure. We define coverage as the fraction of instances in which a reduction method fully retains the MFS, which serves as a proxy metric that requires neither web access nor LLM inference. We validate that coverage strongly correlates with end-to-end success rate, with over 100$\times$ speedup in cumulative evaluation time on both benchmarks. Using this framework, we find that extractive HTML reduction methods require either high computation cost or domain-specific optimization to reduce agent latency while maintaining performance. Building on this, we optimize a pruning program on MFS training data, achieving 2.2$\times$ faster per-step latency on WorkArena L1 while retaining 84\% of the original success rate, and 3.1$\times$ faster on WebLinx while retaining 89\%.
Comments: 22 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.29397 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.29397v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29397
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Masafumi Enomoto [view email]
[v1] Thu, 28 May 2026 05:46:39 UTC (1,385 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Revisiting Observation Reduction for Web Agents: Comprehensive Evaluation with a Lightweight Framework, by Masafumi Enomoto and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language