Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Extraction of Evaluation Objects from Academic Review Texts: Evidence from Chinese Library and Information Science
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2608.29526 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Aug 2026]
Title:Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Extraction of Evaluation Objects from Academic Review Texts: Evidence from Chinese Library and Information Science
View a PDF of the paper titled Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Extraction of Evaluation Objects from Academic Review Texts: Evidence from Chinese Library and Information Science, by Haolin Chen and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Academic reviews, scholarly commentaries, and book reviews serve as sources of evaluative statements about theories, methods, literature, institutions, and policies, providing valuable evidence for scholarly evaluation. Existing scientific entity extraction methods mainly target research articles and are less effective for evaluation objects, which are often abstract, context-dependent, and characterized by ambiguous type boundaries. This study proposes an ontology-guided multi-agent framework for evaluation object extraction. The framework combines candidate discovery, ontology-constrained classification, and domain review. Experimental results show that it achieves a Precision of 90.33%, Recall of 84.55%, Entity-level F1 of 87.34%, Strict Typed F1 of 79.78%, and Type Accuracy of 91.35%, substantially outperforming rule-based and zero-shot baselines. Ablation results indicate that the multi-agent workflow improves recall and stability, while ontology-based boundary constraints enhance fine-grained classification and reduce category confusion. The framework supports the structured utilization of evaluative scholarly texts and provides methodological support for evidence-based research evaluation and STI mining.
| Comments: | 13 pages, 1 figure; accepted at ASIS&T METSTI |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.29526 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.29526v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29526
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
View a PDF of the paper titled Ontology-Guided Multi-Agent Extraction of Evaluation Objects from Academic Review Texts: Evidence from Chinese Library and Information Science, by Haolin Chen and 5 other authors
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.