Hugging Face Daily Papers · · 5 min read

Intent Speaks Louder: Controllable User Simulation Beyond Response Imitation

Mirrored from Hugging Face Daily Papers for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

User simulators are widely used as scalable environments for training and evaluating interactive assistants. Generating the next user turn is inherently one-to-many: the same profile and dialogue context may support multiple plausible continuations with different local interaction intents. A fluent response may therefore advance the dialogue through an inappropriate intent, such as acceptance rather than repair. Our key insight is that controllable user simulation should separate which local interaction intent the next user turn should realize from how that intent is expressed in language. We introduce UserIDA (User Intent-Directive Alignment), which exposes interaction intent as an explicit per-turn directive. UserIDA defines a six-way intent interface, learns directive-conditioned generation through supervised fine-tuning, and uses intent-calibrated policy optimization during group-based reinforcement learning. The reward preserves composite response quality while ensuring that intent-violating candidates rank below compliant alternatives in mixed groups. On LMSYS-USP, UserIDA achieves 86.6% intent accuracy, outperforming the strongest dedicated user-simulator baseline by 24.3 percentage points while improving semantic and stylistic similarity. In within-context interventions, it realizes at least four of the six target intents in 91.7% of evaluated dialogue states, compared with 22.9% for the strongest external baseline. These results establish per-turn intent control as a complementary dimension to response fidelity in user simulation.</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-08-11T03:06:28.982Z","author":{"_id":"66b9bfade085a5c7e7c24669","avatarUrl":"/avatars/db9a5ca6d5568555a97c578ba0820508.svg","fullname":"Rising0321","name":"RisingZhang","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":1,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.9044831991195679},"editors":["RisingZhang"],"editorAvatarUrls":["/avatars/db9a5ca6d5568555a97c578ba0820508.svg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2608.09420","authors":[{"_id":"6a7a90c8019ce76dc7b3aa5c","user":{"_id":"663f334bff178bd7ef888ffb","avatarUrl":"/avatars/60f6dc6785b8cdc722c7400492337969.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Bo Wang","user":"ptwang773","type":"user","name":"ptwang773"},"name":"Bo Wang","status":"claimed_verified","statusLastChangedAt":"2026-08-11T08:45:04.494Z","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a7a90c8019ce76dc7b3aa5d","name":"Ruixing Zhang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a7a90c8019ce76dc7b3aa5e","name":"Yunqi Liu","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a7a90c8019ce76dc7b3aa5f","name":"Yang Zhang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a7a90c8019ce76dc7b3aa60","name":"Liangzhe Han","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a7a90c8019ce76dc7b3aa61","name":"Tongyu Zhu","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a7a90c8019ce76dc7b3aa62","name":"Leilei Sun","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-08-10T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-08-11T00:00:00.000Z","title":"Intent Speaks Louder: Controllable User Simulation Beyond Response Imitation","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"66b9bfade085a5c7e7c24669","avatarUrl":"/avatars/db9a5ca6d5568555a97c578ba0820508.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Rising0321","user":"RisingZhang","type":"user","name":"RisingZhang"},"summary":"User simulators are widely used as scalable environments for training and evaluating interactive assistants. Generating the next user turn is inherently one-to-many: the same profile and dialogue context may support multiple plausible continuations with different local interaction intents. A fluent response may therefore advance the dialogue through an inappropriate intent, such as acceptance rather than repair. Our key insight is that controllable user simulation should separate which local interaction intent the next user turn should realize from how that intent is expressed in language. We introduce UserIDA (User Intent-Directive Alignment), which exposes interaction intent as an explicit per-turn directive. UserIDA defines a six-way intent interface, learns directive-conditioned generation through supervised fine-tuning, and uses intent-calibrated policy optimization during group-based reinforcement learning. The reward preserves composite response quality while ensuring that intent-violating candidates rank below compliant alternatives in mixed groups. On LMSYS-USP, UserIDA achieves 86.6\\% intent accuracy, outperforming the strongest dedicated user-simulator baseline by 24.3 percentage points while improving semantic and stylistic similarity. In within-context interventions, it realizes at least four of the six target intents in 91.7\\% of evaluated dialogue states, compared with 22.9\\% for the strongest external baseline. These results establish per-turn intent control as a complementary dimension to response fidelity in user simulation.","upvotes":3,"discussionId":"6a7a90c9019ce76dc7b3aa63","githubRepo":"https://github.com/ptwang773/UserIDA","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"UserIDA improves user simulators by explicitly controlling interaction intent per turn through directive-conditioned generation and calibrated reinforcement learning.","ai_keywords":["supervised fine-tuning","group-based reinforcement learning","policy optimization","intent-calibrated reward","directive-conditioned generation"],"ai_summary_model":"thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small","githubStars":1,"organization":{"_id":"63ba7720fc454697637969f1","name":"Beihang","fullname":"Beihang University","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63ba7666c138c8f2b7844b58/n98lZU9VWxYgWIkzE_6o4.jpeg"}},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"66b9bfade085a5c7e7c24669","avatarUrl":"/avatars/db9a5ca6d5568555a97c578ba0820508.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Rising0321","user":"RisingZhang","type":"user"},{"_id":"663f334bff178bd7ef888ffb","avatarUrl":"/avatars/60f6dc6785b8cdc722c7400492337969.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Bo Wang","user":"ptwang773","type":"user"},{"_id":"63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63ac5701c21e60a3e9b58aa7/g6EX7diOpuA94R2ab-rZC.png","isPro":true,"fullname":"Dipankar Sarkar","user":"dipankarsarkar","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"organization":{"_id":"63ba7720fc454697637969f1","name":"Beihang","fullname":"Beihang University","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/63ba7666c138c8f2b7844b58/n98lZU9VWxYgWIkzE_6o4.jpeg"},"markdownContentUrl":"https://huggingface.co/buckets/huggingchat/papers-content/resolve/2608/2608.09420.md","query":{}}">
Papers
arxiv:2608.09420

Intent Speaks Louder: Controllable User Simulation Beyond Response Imitation

Published on Aug 10
· Submitted by
Rising0321
on Aug 11
Authors:

Abstract

UserIDA improves user simulators by explicitly controlling interaction intent per turn through directive-conditioned generation and calibrated reinforcement learning.

User simulators are widely used as scalable environments for training and evaluating interactive assistants. Generating the next user turn is inherently one-to-many: the same profile and dialogue context may support multiple plausible continuations with different local interaction intents. A fluent response may therefore advance the dialogue through an inappropriate intent, such as acceptance rather than repair. Our key insight is that controllable user simulation should separate which local interaction intent the next user turn should realize from how that intent is expressed in language. We introduce UserIDA (User Intent-Directive Alignment), which exposes interaction intent as an explicit per-turn directive. UserIDA defines a six-way intent interface, learns directive-conditioned generation through supervised fine-tuning, and uses intent-calibrated policy optimization during group-based reinforcement learning. The reward preserves composite response quality while ensuring that intent-violating candidates rank below compliant alternatives in mixed groups. On LMSYS-USP, UserIDA achieves 86.6\% intent accuracy, outperforming the strongest dedicated user-simulator baseline by 24.3 percentage points while improving semantic and stylistic similarity. In within-context interventions, it realizes at least four of the six target intents in 91.7\% of evaluated dialogue states, compared with 22.9\% for the strongest external baseline. These results establish per-turn intent control as a complementary dimension to response fidelity in user simulation.

Community

User simulators are widely used as scalable environments for training and evaluating interactive assistants. Generating the next user turn is inherently one-to-many: the same profile and dialogue context may support multiple plausible continuations with different local interaction intents. A fluent response may therefore advance the dialogue through an inappropriate intent, such as acceptance rather than repair. Our key insight is that controllable user simulation should separate which local interaction intent the next user turn should realize from how that intent is expressed in language. We introduce UserIDA (User Intent-Directive Alignment), which exposes interaction intent as an explicit per-turn directive. UserIDA defines a six-way intent interface, learns directive-conditioned generation through supervised fine-tuning, and uses intent-calibrated policy optimization during group-based reinforcement learning. The reward preserves composite response quality while ensuring that intent-violating candidates rank below compliant alternatives in mixed groups. On LMSYS-USP, UserIDA achieves 86.6% intent accuracy, outperforming the strongest dedicated user-simulator baseline by 24.3 percentage points while improving semantic and stylistic similarity. In within-context interventions, it realizes at least four of the six target intents in 91.7% of evaluated dialogue states, compared with 22.9% for the strongest external baseline. These results establish per-turn intent control as a complementary dimension to response fidelity in user simulation.

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.09420
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.09420 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.09420 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.09420 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from Hugging Face Daily Papers